Sexual Obssession, Into the Dungeons of the Mindset of Trollywood

By Individualist
“The Purpose of government is to limit the needs of its citizens from the involvement of the government.”

Moving from Shadow to Night, Hiding from Truth’s Grasp
Sinking into the depths where cavernous plotting doth twist
Lies and Deception mask the Hatred and Venom of the Asp
Where Power and Fame are the Lost Soul’s only Grist



This will be the first of two posts this week related to each other in concept. This post will cover serious and adult topics of the liberals need to denigrate and humiliate conservative women through sexual depraved insults and slanders. This post will deal with the what and potentially the why. The next will deal with the possible response we should have to it. This may be lengthy as I feel I need to cover material to prove my point. Enjoy.



I have to travel a lot for my work and stay in Hotels. One particular Hotel offers movies labeled “Still in Theaters”, “Recent Attractions” and “Adult” for sale. Just click the orange button and you’ve spent $16. You can page through the movies four at a time by hitting nine. If you get through the Recent Attractions it will take you to the Adult films and the first one that is shown is below:



Just one click too many and there you have it the Best Seller 4 and a half star porn film “Who’s Nailin Palin”. What a sweet tribute to the Governor of Alaska, I wonder who is behind it. I found it so disturbing I decided to research what was behind this.

It was released by Larry Flint’s Hustler magazine in October of 2008 just in time for the election. There was a link to the script which starts out with two Russians whose Tank breaks down outside of Palin’s house and she evidently uses her “diplomatic” skills to improve relations with the Ruskies. I did not read further. At this point it is not the Porn that is getting to me it is the venomous cruelty behind it.

In my research I found that this industrious crew has not had enough of slandering the Governor, no they want to make more such movies. On June 12 Hustler’s Roger Klipon, Krypton, whatever made an offer to Carrie Prajean for $500K below:

“We were so sorry to hear about your recent departure from the Miss California Organization. However I think we have some news that can turn this situation around. Your reign as Miss California doesn’t have to end.

Hustler Video would like to offer you to play the role of California in our new interactive parody film, Your Nailin Palin. Your scene would feature some hot girl-on-girl action with adult performer Lisa Ann who’s portraying the former VP candidate. Don’t worry you’ll have some chance to have opposite sex as well. Can’t wait to hear what you think.”

Classy huh! Klipon is definitely a people person isn’t he.

Greg Gutfeld has touched on this theme at Big Hollywood.



Eminem Post

Another post by Mr. Gutfeld on Big Hollywood about the writings of Henry “the Tool” Rollins regarding Ann Coulter:

Henry Rollin's Post

Essentially Mr. Rollins expresses his superior debating skills in the old Lincoln Douglas debate format where his reasoning is as follows. You’re going to be my sex slave and I will force myself on you and then you will Shut the F*** up. Has a way with the ladies, doesn’t he.

So I am now asking myself the question what is it with the left and their obsession with conservative women. After all this is not just petty and trite, it is sickeningly mean. Larry Flint is supposedly sitting on a Gold mine so what is he so unhappy about? What the heck did Carrie Prejean do? What justifies trying to harm everyone that disagrees with you politically? How Pathetic!

Then of course there are wannabees. Here’s a juicy clip from the “Anger” guy or is it “Auger” guy. He is digging himself into a hole.



Auger Guy posted a video of two Asian women in a Lesbian scene. The video edited out by me showed another women in white panties being pulled down by the woman shown here in the picture. Auger Guy had this to say:

“And is it just me or does the girl at the front look like Michelle Malkin? Ohhhhhh, I just thought of a horribly devious thing to do. Maybe I should rename this post to “Michell Malkin lesbian sex tape released”. That oughta genrate some pervy search engine traffic.”

That’s right Auger don’t they all look alike. It’s not a bigoted cliché when “progressives” do it. When his video was flagged and removed this was his response:

“this is the work or some loser hater, not a genuinely offended person. It isn’t as if it matters anyway, this is hardly an important video to me. Either it was one of the normal boring haters who thought they were getting back at me by doing or it was a Malkin supporter. Either way, f*** you losers.”

Evidently he posts stills of naked women and suggestive titles over some liberal rant because people who like “porn” don’t know how to hit the “stop” button. But it doesn’t matter anyways (his words). What strikes me as funny is that he would post this of Michelle Malkin and then call someone who was offended by that “the Hater”. But this guy is just fooling around but he doesn’t even clue in to what a slanderous fool he is.

Then we come to David Bedwetterman. His non-apology was actually more offensive than his joke. I did not mention rape. No Dave, you just inferred it by making the impregnator in the joke a man who was publicly accused of rape. I meant the older daughter. Yes and all 17 year girls who make a mistake and get pregnant and make the courageous decision to keep their child instead of murdering it deserve to have jokes made about them about rapists impregnating them. Supposedly he gave a real apology yesterday but at this point it is just to save his career so I did not bother to find it and listen.

Just when I thought the gutter’s bottom was reached we slide right into the sewer drain. The most offensive I think came in the response from the National Organization for Women.

Now Response
“The sexualization of girls and women in the media is reaching new lows these days — it is exploitative and has a negative effect on how all women and girls are perceived and how they view themselves. Letterman also joked about what he called Palin’s “slutty flight attendant look” — yet another example of how the media love to focus on a woman politician’s appearance, especially as it relates to her sexual appeal to men. Someone of Letterman’s stature, who appears on what used to be known as “the Tiffany Network” (CBS), should be above wallowing in the juvenile, sexist mud that other comedians and broadcasters seem to prefer.

On that point, it’s important to note that when Chelsea Clinton was 13 years old she was the target of numerous insults based on her appearance. Rush Limbaugh even referred to her as the “White House dog.” NOW hopes that all the conservatives who are fired up about sexism in the media lately will join us in calling out sexism when it is directed at women who aren’t professed conservatives.”

So Letterman should be taken to task for the “slutty flight attendant” line but not for inferring “rape” of a child. Exactly what in the blue blazes does a comment that Rush Limbaugh made in 1992 have to do with it. Well NOW let’s examine that comment shall we.

Lying Liar

Let’s see, the reference you give about conservatives getting fired up evidently references the Franken lie and not the actual show that aired. Franken could not even get the year of the show correct, 1992 and not 1993. So Bedwetterman makes a “rape” joke about a child (actually two children because the listener can infer either one) we conservatives are supposed to wear hair shirts because AL Franken lied about what Rush Limbaugh said 17 years ago. I guess the line about women never forgetting slight applies here.

Ok NOW you are voted the Organization Most Likely to Support a Misogynist, the OSMOSIS award. That’s right Move Over Taliban the NOW Gals have edged you out. Watch for white powder in the reward envelope when it is sent back because I believe Bin Ladin had it last.

But we are not done with the conservobabes yet. No sir we have heard from Hustler now let’s hear from Playboy. There was an article on Playboy’s website that was eventually pulled because it was so offensive by Guy Cimbalo.

Right Wing News

It is discussed very eloquently by Right Wing News. Essentially it is a list of 10 top conservative women Mr. Cimbalo would like to Hate F***. “Rape” involves hating and intercourse does it not. Hmmm….

These aggrieved women are
• Michelle Malkin
• Megyn Kelly
• Mary Katharine Ham
• Amanda Carpenter
• Elisabeth Hasselbeck
• Dana Perino
• Laura Ingraham
• Pamela Geller
• Michele Bachmann
• Peggy Noonan

And again the so-called feminist response itself is in its own way more hurtful than the article.

Salon.com

http://www.usnews.com/blogs/erbe/2009/06/03/playboy-mix-of-sex-hate-and-politics-demeans-conservative-women.html

I could elaborate but I will chose instead to list the post by “Unbelievable” instead:

Unbelievable...
“So, advocating the rape of someone who holds political views that you disagree with is somehow less repulsive than advocating the rape of someone who holds the same political views you do? And in fact it is a sliding scale. Michele Malkin being further to one end than Amanda Carpenter.

Really? I think rape is equally repulsive no matter who the victim is. I think assigning worth to people based on their political views is also repulsive.
What? Did your editor tell you (that) you must write an article condemning Playboy and this is the best you can come up with? You're as disgusting as the author of the Playboy article.”

In conclusion what should we conservatives make of this. Right Wing News is spot on. This is not just meanness and off the cuff ad hominem attacks. This is an attempt to threaten conservative women and scare them off by indulging in the basest and sickest sexual references. The so-called feminists compound the issue with fake statements of condemnation that end up being off hand insults aimed at their conservative values. You can see with the repetition of the tactic that this a just a play from a strategy book.

But the motivations behind it are belied by their words. Liberal men fear conservative women because you actually have to listen to them and to convince them you have to show them. With a liberal woman you can pretend to listen to their rants about misogyny and equal rights and at the right time you parrot what they say back to them. Just like the snickers commercial where the guy asks the girl back to his room and then saves himself by “blogging” for the cause. Because all a liberal woman cares about is your submission to identity politics. With a conservative woman she does not involve herself in identity politics. She actually wants an honest answer. There are no cheat sheets on the correct answers in articles in women’s magazines. Hint for liberals: It’s called independent thought.

So it is easier to be crude and sexual harass them to make them feel small in an attempt to keep them from speaking out. The feminists play right into it. In the Salon.com articles Michelle Malkin has her husband to write her speeches for her. She is derided as the “little woman” dependent on some man. The insults have layers to them. The left cannot have famous conservative women because they would lose that leg of identity politics. How can you tell a 20 something male he has to vote liberal to get laid when there are gorgeous women like Ann Coulter, Michelle Malkin, Laura Ingraham et al. The answer is you can’t. So they do everything to hurt these woman. Politics is more important than Truth to a Liberal.

So they act like Trolls. How a propros!